更多"[不定项选择题]Magic(魔法)0ften forces us no"的相关试题:
[不定项选择题]Magic(魔法)0ften forces us not to believe our own eyes or even appears to be breaking
the laws of physics or nature! The word " magic"has many different meanings. When a bird appears in a hat or when someone declares that he could see into the future--both can be called magic. When a sick person suddenly becomes well or a well person (or even animal)becomes ill, magic is the cause. The British author Terry Pratchett uses magic a great deal in his popular Discworld series of books.
Magic has always been used for fun. People enjoy working out in which cup the little ball is or how he knows which card I was thinking of. Harry Houdini was one of the first world-famous magicians--famous for escaping from deadly situations. Recently David Copperfield, or David Blane, has become very popular for his " unbelievable abilities", such as making the Statue of Liberty disappear or rise.
Magical rings and three-headed dogs may not be real, but does this mean nothing magical really exists? Can you always explain how the magician has done the card trick? Maybe it is better not to explain, but to leave a little magic in our lives. Pick a card, any card...
Who is mentioned as a great escape artist?
A.Harry Houdini.
B.David Blanc.
C.David Copperfield.
D.Terry Pratchett.
[不定项选择题]Passage Four
Magic(魔法)often forces us not to believe our own eyes or even appears to be breaking the laws of physics or nature! The word“magic”has many different meanings．When a bird appears in a hat or when someone declares that he could see into the future--both can be called magic．When a sick person suddenly becomes well or a well person(or even animal)becomes ill, magic is the cause．The British author Terry Pratchett uses magic a great deal in his popular Discworld series of books．
Magic has always been used for fun．People enjoy working out in which cup the little ball is or how he knows which card l was thinking of．Harry Houdini was one of the first world-famous magicians—famous for escaping from deadly situations．Recently David Copperfield，or David Blane，has become very popular for his“unbelievable abilities”，such as making the Statue of Liberty disappear or rise．
Magical rings and three—headed dogs may not be real，but does this mean nothing magical really exists? Can you always explain how the magician has done the card trick? Maybe it is better not to explain，but to leave a little magic in our lives．Pick a card．any card．．．
Who is mentioned as a great escape artist?
A.David Blane
B.Harry Houdini．
C.Terry Pratchett．
D.David Copperfield
[不定项选择题]Psychology tells us that many people hate to take risks. But it is good for us to take risks, especially when the risk is to achieve a desired result. In that way, we become stronger and braver.
Our human nature should be to take risks, but some people just sit and wish they didn't have the fear to move on. This is because they failed a few times in their lives. Please step out and don't let the past hold you back from living life to the fullest. Move forward and move on! In studying the psychology of taking risks, we find that human provides us with the desire to experiment and take chances.
Risk taking is a great advantage that allowed our ancestors to become stronger and stronger day by day. By taking risks they fought off enemies and discovered new territories. This attitude has become a part of our modem culture. Riding a roller caster is a common risk taking activity. Even each person seems to enjoy the risk although they have the understanding that it is dangerous. This psychological and biological connection creates an interesting connection between what is unsafe and what humans enjoy.
Getting in a car each day is a risk. Getting out of bed is a risk, too. We need to take risks so that we can complete many things. Astronauts take risks when they get inside a rocket; however,the things they achieve are great. Businessmen take a risk when they buy parts of a company, however, without doing that, they could not make more money.
We need to take risks so that we can gain something. It is impossible to move forward in life, earn money, enjoy a relationship, play a sport, or doing anything else without taking a risk. It is all part of the game. It' s one of the most important parts of life.
What would be the title for the passage?
A.Taking Risks Is Easier Said than Done
B.Risks Taken by Ancestors
C.Live Our Life to the Fullest
D.No Risk, No Gain
[不定项选择题]The US $3-million Fundamental Physics Prize is indeed an interesting experiment, as Alexander Polyakov said when he accepted this year’s award in March. And it is far from the only one of its type. As a News Feature article in Nature discusses, a string of lucrative awards for researchers have joined the Nobel Prizes in recent years. Many, like the Fundamental Physics Prize, are funded from the telephone-number-sized bank accounts of Internet entrepreneurs. These benefactors have succeeded in their chosen fields, they say, and they want to use their wealth to draw attention to those who have succeeded in science.
What’s not to like? Quite a lot, according to a handful of scientists quoted in the News Feature. You cannot buy class, as the old saying goes, and these upstart entrepreneurs cannot buy their prizes the prestige of the Nobels. The new awards are an exercise in self-promotion for those behind them, say scientists. They could distort the achievement-based system of peer-review-led research. They could cement the status quo of peer-reviewed research. They do not fund peer-reviewed research. They perpetuate the myth of the lone genius.
The goals of the prize-givers seem as scattered as the criticism. Some want to shock, others to draw people into science, or to better reward those who have made their careers in research.
As Nature has pointed out before, there are some legitimate concerns about how science prizes—both new and old—are distributed. The Breakthrough Prize in Life Sciences, launched this year, takes an unrepresentative view of what the life sciences include. But the Nobel Foundation’s limit of three recipients per prize, each of whom must still be living, has long been outgrown by the collaborative nature of modern research—as will be demonstrated by the inevitable row over who is ignored when it comes to acknowledging the discovery of the Higgs boson. The Nobels were, of course, themselves set up by a very rich individual who had decided what he wanted to do with his own money. Time, rather than intention, has given them legitimacy.
As much as some scientists may complain about the new awards, two things seem clear. First, most researchers would accept such a prize if they were offered one. Second, it is surely a good thing that the money and attention come to science rather than go elsewhere. It is fair to criticize and question the mechanism—that is the culture of research, after all—but it is the prize-givers’ money to do with as they please. It is wise to take such gifts with gratitude and grace.
The author believes that the new awards are _____.
A.acceptable despite the criticism
B.harmful to the culture of research
C.subject to undesirable changes
D.unworthy of public attention
[不定项选择题]共用题干
A家具生产企业木加工车间内有油漆木制件的砂、抛、磨加工等工序，车间内有有机溶剂和废弃的油漆桶等。车间的除尘净化系统采用反吹布袋除尘器。因新增了设备并扩大了生产规模，致使车间内粉尘浓度超标。为了治理车间内粉尘污染，将布袋除尘器由原有的4套增加到8套，车间内木粉尘浓度经处理后小于10mg/m3。
2 0 0 8年7月5日9时2 0分，除尘净化系统3号除尘器内发生燃爆着火，并瞬间引起4号除尘器内燃爆着火，造成燃爆点周边20m范围内部分厂房和设施损坏。由于燃爆区域内当时无人，未造成人员伤亡。
根据以上场景，回答下列问题（共14分，每小题2分，1～3题为单选题，4～7题为多选题）：
根据《生产过程危险和有害因素分类与代码》( GB/T13 8 61-19 9 2)，该企业存在的物理性危险和有害因素包括 ( )
A.木粉尘
B.油漆木制件砂、抛、磨过程中的噪声
C.作业环境不良
D.高温物质
E.使用的有机溶剂和废弃油漆桶内的油漆等挥发的有机气体
