更多"[不定项选择题]"的相关试题:
[不定项选择题]All around the world, lawyers generate more hostility than the members of any other profession—with the possible exception of journalism. But there are few places where clients have more grounds for complaint than America.
During the decade before the economic crisis, spending on legal services in America grew twice as fast as inflation. The best lawyers made skyscrapers-full of money, tempting ever more students to pile into law schools. But most law graduates never get a big-firm job. Many of them instead become the kind of nuisance-lawsuit filer that makes the tort system a costly nightmare.
There are many reasons for this. One is the excessive costs of a legal education. There is just one path for a lawyer in most American states: a four-year undergraduate degree in some unrelated subject, then a three-year law degree at one of 200 law schools authorized by the American Bar Association and an expensive preparation for the bar exam. This leaves today’s average law-school graduate with$100,000 of debt on top of undergraduate debts. Law-school debt means that they have to work fearsomely hard.
Reforming the system would help both lawyers and their customers. Sensible ideas have been around for a long time, but the state-level bodies that govern the profession have been too conservative to implement them. One idea is to allow people to study law as an undergraduate degree. Another is to let students sit for the bar after only two years of law school. If the bar exam is truly a stern enough test for a would-be lawyer, those who can sit it earlier should be allowed to do so. Students who do not need the extra training could cut their debt mountain by a third.
The other reason why costs are so high is the restrictive guild-like ownership structure of the business. Except in the District of Columbia, non-lawyers may not own any share of a law firm. This keeps fees high and innovation slow. There is pressure for change from within the profession, but opponents of change among the regulators insist that keeping outsiders out of a law firm isolates lawyers from the pressure to make money rather than serve clients ethically.
In fact, allowing non-lawyers to own shares in law firms would reduce costs and improve services to customers, by encouraging law firms to use technology and to employ professional managers to focus on improving firms’ efficiency. After all, other countries, such as Australia and Britain, have started liberalizing their legal professions. America should follow.
The guild-like ownership structure is considered “restrictive” partly because it _____.
A.bans outsiders’ involvement in the profession
B.keeps lawyers from holding law-firm shares
C.aggravates the ethical situation in the trade
D.prevents lawyers from gaining due profits
[不定项选择题]共用题干
A家具生产企业木加工车间内有油漆木制件的砂、抛、磨加工等工序，车间内有有机溶剂和废弃的油漆桶等。车间的除尘净化系统采用反吹布袋除尘器。因新增了设备并扩大了生产规模，致使车间内粉尘浓度超标。为了治理车间内粉尘污染，将布袋除尘器由原有的4套增加到8套，车间内木粉尘浓度经处理后小于10mg/m3。
2 0 0 8年7月5日9时2 0分，除尘净化系统3号除尘器内发生燃爆着火，并瞬间引起4号除尘器内燃爆着火，造成燃爆点周边20m范围内部分厂房和设施损坏。由于燃爆区域内当时无人，未造成人员伤亡。
根据以上场景，回答下列问题（共14分，每小题2分，1～3题为单选题，4～7题为多选题）：
根据《工业企业设计卫生标准》（GBZ1-2 0 0 2），下列关于该企业除尘净化系统设计和安装要求的说法中，正确的包括 ( )
A.输送含尘气体的管道必须水平设置
B.设置水平管道时，可不设清扫孔
C.输送含尘气体的管道应与地面成适度夹角
D.在有爆炸性粉尘及有毒有害气体的除尘净化系统中，应设置检测装置
E.为便于测试，设计中应在除尘净化系统的适当位置设测试孔
