[简答题]How does the cognitive psychology explain the acquisition of knowledge

[简答题]How does the cognitive psychology explain the acquisition of knowledge

[简答题]cognitive psychology

[单项选择]You must explain to us how they succeeded（）the experiment.
A. for
B. at
C. in
D. to

[简答题]How does the acculturation theory explain the second language acquisition

[简答题]How does the habit-formation theory explain the second language acquisition process

[填空题]In cognitive psychology, studies of learning strategies with first language
learners have concentrated on determining the effects of strategy training on
different kinds of tasks and learners. Findings from these studies generally
indicated that strategy training is effective in improving the performance of
students on wide range of reading comprehension and problem-solving (57)______
tasks. One of the more important outcome of these psychological studies (58)______
was the formulation of learning strategies in an information-processing theo-
retical model. This model contains an executive, or metacognitive, function
in addition with an operative, or cognitive-processing, function. Metacogni- (59)______
tive strategies involve in thinking about the learning process, planning for (60)______
learning, monitoring of comprehension or production while it is taken (61)______
place, or self-evaluation after the learning acti

[单项选择]What does the man explain
A. The availability of some items
B. The price of an item
C. The stock due for clearance
D. The products on display

[单项选择]How exactly, does science work How do scientists go about doing science Ordinarily we think science proceeds in a straight-forward way. Ideally scientists make observations, formulate hypotheses (假设), and test those hypotheses by making further observations. When there is difference between what is observed and what is predicted by the hypothesis, the hypothesis is revised. Science proceeds in this way, which is a gradual method of finding the best fit between observation and prediction.
But this idealized version of how one does science is naive. Although science demands proof that observations made by one observer be observable by other observers using the same methods, it is by no means clear that, even when confronted with identical phenomena, different observers will report identical observations. And it is most certain that, even if the same observations are made, the conclusions as to the meaning of the observations frequently differ.
The fact is that all of us, scient
A. When people face the same phenomena, they will have the same observations.
B. Variations in observation and conclusion are related to human perception.
C. People using the same methods of observation can still make different observations.
D. People often reach different conclusions even when they make the same observations.