Do we need laws that prevent us from
running risks with our lives If so, then perhaps laws are needed prohibiting
(禁止) the sale of cigarettes and alcoholic drinks. Both products have been known
to kill people. The hazards of drinking too much alcohol are as bad or worse
than the hazards of smoking too many cigarettes. All right then, let’s pass a
law dosing the liquor stores and the bars in this country. Let’s put an end once
and for all to the disease from which as many as 10 million Americans currently
suffer -- alcoholism(酗酒)。 But wait. We’ve already tried that.
For 13 years, between 1920 and 1933, there were no liquor stores anywhere in the
United States. They were shut down -- abolished by an amendment (修正案), the
Volstead Act. After January 20, 1920, there was supposed to be no more
manufacturing, selling, or t A. lived in fear of the law B. endangered their communities C. were respectful of the legal sanctions placed of them D. were willing to risk arrest for the pleasure of liquor
更多"{{B}}Passage One{{/B}}
"的相关试题:
[单项选择] {{B}}Passage One{{/B}}
Do we need laws that prevent us from
running risks with our lives If so, then perhaps laws are needed prohibiting
(禁止) the sale of cigarettes and alcoholic drinks. Both products have been known
to kill people. The hazards of drinking too much alcohol are as bad or worse
than the hazards of smoking too many cigarettes. All right then, let’s pass a
law dosing the liquor stores and the bars in this country. Let’s put an end once
and for all to the disease from which as many as 10 million Americans currently
suffer -- alcoholism(酗酒)。 But wait. We’ve already tried that.
For 13 years, between 1920 and 1933, there were no liquor stores anywhere in the
United States. They were shut down -- abolished by an amendment (修正案), the
Volstead Act. After January 20, 1920, there was supposed to be no more
manufacturing, selling, or t A. without liquor, people would not drink B. there would be no further danger to the public from alcoholism C. there would be a rise in the cost of alcoholic beverages D. people would not become drunk or create a public nuisance
[单项选择] Passage One
Climate scientists need to swallow
their mistrusts and share their data and working methods with their critics. So
concludes an inquiry by British members of parliament into the "climategate"
affair, in which damaging emails were copied from a computer server at the
University of East Anglia in Norwich, UK, and published on the Internet. But,
unexpectedly, the House of Commons Science and Technology Committee has placed
more blame on the university than on the scientists at its Climatic Research
Unit (CRU), whose emails were stolen, and the unit’s director Phil
Jones. This verdict puts the official university inquiry
launched last December in a strange position. Vice-chancellor Edward Acton asked
the inquiry to report on possible misdeeds at CRU. Now MPs suggest that the
university itself may be at least as much to blame. The M A. to share their information with the public B. to take more responsibility for the affair C. to be open to their critics about their date and approaches D. to examine the computer server at the university of east Anglia in Norwich
[单项选择]Do we need laws that prevent us from running risks with our lives If so, then perhaps laws are needed prohibiting (禁止) the sale of cigarettes and alcoholic drinks. Both products have been known to kill people. The hazards of drinking too much alcohol are as bad or worse than the hazards of smoking too many cigarettes. All right then, let’s pass a law closing the liquor stores and the bars in this country. Let’s put an end once and for all to the disease from which as many as 10 million Americans currently suffer alcoholism (酗酒). But wait. We’ve already tried that. For 13 years, between 1920 and 1933, there were no liquor stores anywhere in the United States. They were shut down—abolished by an amendment (修正案), the Volstead Act. After January 20, 1920, there was supposed to be no more manufacturing, selling, or transporting of "intoxication liquors." Without any more liquor, people could not drink it. And if they did not drink it, how could they get drunk There would be no more dan A. without liquor, people would not drink B. there would be no further danger to the public from alcoholism C. there would be a rise in the cost of alcoholic beverages D. people would not become drunk or create a public nuisance
购买搜题卡查看答案
[会员特权] 开通VIP, 查看 全部题目答案
[会员特权] 享免全部广告特权
请选择支付方式
-
微信支付
-
支付宝支付
立即支付
系统将自动为您注册账号
请使用微信扫码支付
截图扫码使用小程序[完全免费查看答案]
请不要关闭本页面,支付完成后请点击【支付完成】按钮
恭喜您,购买搜题卡成功
重要提示:请拍照或截图保存账号密码!
我要搜题网官网:https://www.woyaosouti.com
我已记住账号密码
| | |