| A few weeks ago, the Food Standards
Agency (FSA. in the UK issued a report evaluating nutrient levels in organic
versus non-organic foods like fruits, vegetables, meats, eggs, and dairy
products. It is a complete, rigorous piece of research. And they found that, in
terms of nutritional content, the differences between organic and non-organic
foods are negligible. As the report states, "... organically and conventionally produced crops and livestock products are broadly comparable in their nutrient content." They did in fact find some nutritional differences between organic and non-organic foods, but concluded that it is "unlikely that these differences in nutrient content are relevant to consumer health." So here they have a nicely delimited (界定的) study of available research with rigorous standards and a fairly worded con A. The differences in nutrients between organic and non-organic foods are insignificant. B. There is significant nutritional difference between organic and non-organic foods. C. The differences in nutrient content are closely related with consumer health. D. Organically and conventionally produced crops and livestock products are noticeable in their nutrient content. [单项选择]
W: Hey, Larry. Do you want to meet a few of us for coffee in a little while A. Continue to read. B. Meet the woman at the library. C. Make some coffee. D. Go out with some friends. [单项选择]How many fast food restaurants are there in the USA
A. One hundred B. Seventy thousand C. Seventeen thousand D. Seven hundred [单项选择]A few weeks ago, the Food Standards Agency (FSA. in the UK issued a report evaluating nutrient levels in organic versus non-organic foods like fruits, vegetables, meats, eggs, and dairy products. It is a complete, rigorous piece of research. And they found that, in terms of nutritional content, the differences between organic and non-organic foods are negligible.
As the report states, "... organically and conventionally produced crops and livestock products are broadly comparable in their nutrient content." They did in fact find some nutritional differences between organic and non-organic foods, but concluded that it is "unlikely that these differences in nutrient content are relevant to consumer health." So here they have a nicely delimited (界定的) study of available research with rigorous standards and a fairly worded conclusion, all publicly available to download and read on the FSA website. The reaction, not surprisingly, was spectacular. The British tabloids alternate A. had noticed the impact of organic agriculture on the environment B. had ignored to examine the effect of pesticide use C. should be criticized for neglecting the benefit of organic food D. has entirely disregarded the intent of the study 我来回答: 提交
|
