[不定项选择题]资料：In a survey,people were asked to choose between treatments to save 600 people from dying a disease. Participants,including physicians,were asked to choose between a certain outcome that 200 people will be saved and a risky choice where there is a one-third probability that 600 people will be saved and a two-thirds probability that no people will be saved. In a second example,the group were asked to choose between allowing 400 people to die or a one-third probably that nobody will die and two-thirds probability that 600 people will die. In both examples,the first choices have an identical outcome as do their second alternatives.But faced with such a grave choice people did not spot the similarities. In the first example people opted to save 200 people over the gamble of losing people and in the second example people preferred the gamble over the certain outcome of killing 400 people. What the experiment shows is that wording can have potentially dangerous consequences.Most of people tend to feel losses much more strongly than the pleasure of making a comparable gain. What is the difference between the two examples mentioned in the passage？
A.The participants
B.The wording
C.The background
D.The contents

[不定项选择题]资料：In a survey,people were asked to choose between treatments to save 600 people from dying a disease. Participants,including physicians,were asked to choose between a certain outcome that 200 people will be saved and a risky choice where there is a one-third probability that 600 people will be saved and a two-thirds probability that no people will be saved. In a second example,the group were asked to choose between allowing 400 people to die or a one-third probably that nobody will die and two-thirds probability that 600 people will die. In both examples,the first choices have an identical outcome as do their second alternatives.But faced with such a grave choice people did not spot the similarities. In the first example people opted to save 200 people over the gamble of losing people and in the second example people preferred the gamble over the certain outcome of killing 400 people. What the experiment shows is that wording can have potentially dangerous consequences.Most of people tend to feel losses much more strongly than the pleasure of making a comparable gain. In the second example，more people choose the option（ ）？
A.with a one-third probability that nobody will die
B.with a two-thirds probability that nobody will be saved
C.allowing 400 people to die
D.that 200 people will be saved

[不定项选择题]资料A市甲股份有限公司（以下简称甲公司）成立于2006年3月，从事化工产品生产，是增值税的一般纳税人。2010年5月，甲公司召开董事会会议，拟审议通过下列事项：更换公司总经理和财务负责人，更换由职工代表担任的公司董事，修改公司章程的部分条款。2011年8月，甲公司经证券监督管理机构核准，开始向社会发行股票募集资金；同年12月，甲公司股票在证券交易所上市交易。2012年10月，甲公司董事刘某参加董事会会议期间，获悉本公司将收购乙上市公司的股份，可能对甲公司股价产生较大影响，于是立即电话通知朋友赵某买进甲公司股票。2013年1月，甲公司因排放污染物超标，被A市环保部门处以5万元罚款；甲公司对处罚决定不服，向人民法院提起行政诉讼。2013年5月，甲公司向小规模纳税人丙公司销售一批化工产品，开具的普通发票上注明的销售价款为58.5万元。 甲公司就销售给丙公司化工产品所取得的收入计算增值税时，销项税额为：
A.1.5万元
B.1.76万元
C.8.5万元
D.9.95万元