[单项选择]在中国，两汉时期的太学中就已经出现了每两年举行一次的升级考试，西方用考试的办法来选拔学生的观念始于16世纪（）教育学家夸美纽斯。
A. 英国
B. 德国
C. 捷克
D. 俄罗斯

[单选题]抢救轻度撞伤没起火的飞机事故时的步骤是( )1、覆盖洒落在地面的油2、分组进行抢救人员,克服群聚现象3、检查机舱是否有人遗留4、备好水枪和泡沫管枪5、对受伤人员分步进行撤离
A.12345
B.23541
C.41253
D.32145

[单选题]安全生产责任制要求明确各岗位的( )、责任范围和考核标准等内容。
A. 责任单位项
B. 责任科室
C. 责任班组
D.责任人员

[名词解释]视杆系统

[简答题]作业人员本线来车下道规定（《普铁安规》铁总运〔2014〕272号 3.2.3）

[多选题]班中更换调车灯显电台，应对所更换的电台进行（ ）试验
A.通话
B.信号
C.信令
D.按键

[单项选择]百日咳应呼吸道隔离到（）
A. 痉挛性咳嗽后1周
B. 痉挛性咳嗽后2周
C. 痉挛性咳嗽后3周
D. 痉挛性咳嗽消失
E. 痉挛性咳嗽消失后1周

[单选题]设有自动喷水灭火系统的停放车辆为 100 辆的地下复式汽车库 , 其防火分区的最大允许建筑面积为（） m2。
A. 200O
B. 4000
C. 1300
D. 2600

[单选题]参加动车组机械师、特种（设备）作业人员、无损检测人员等委外培训，因个人原因或违反培训机构相关管理规定，导致考试（考核）不通过，考核( )元/次。
A.20
B.20-50
C.30
D.200

[单选题]变速器在空挡位置，发动机怠速运转，若听到“咯噎”声，踏下离合器踏板后响声消失，说明（）。
A.第一轴前轴承损坏
B.常啮齿轮啮合不良
C.第二轴后轴承松旷或损坏
D.第一轴后轴承响

[单选题]下列文件资料中，不属于专利权属资料的是（　）。
A.专利证书
B.专利说明书
C.专利登记簿副本
D.专利维持费缴费凭证

[多项选择]

患者，男性，64岁，有肺心病史5年，经常头痛头晕，1周来咳嗽加重，咳黄痰，呼吸困难，头痛加重，昨日起嗜睡，谵语。查体：神志不清，颜面水肿，球结膜水肿，口唇发绀，颈静脉充盈，双肺广泛干湿啰音，肝肋下4cm，腹腔积液症（+），下肢水肿，膝腱反射减弱，巴宾斯基症（+）。pH7.20，PaCO₂100mmHg，PaO₂40mmHg，HCO^-₃21mmol／L。

需行哪些检查（）
A. 头颅CT
B. 血生化
C. 胸片
D. 腹部超声
E. 血气分析
F. 肺功能

[判断题]淘宝客推广是一种先成交后付费的推广模式。 ( )
A.正确
B.错误

[单项选择]根据耕地占用税的相关规定，计算耕地占用税时，适用税额为每平方米6～30元的人均耕地面积为( )。
A. 不超过1亩
B. 超过1亩但不超过2亩
C. 超过2亩但不超过3亩
D. 超过3亩以上

[单选题]Little Jim should love_____ to the theatre this evening.
A.to be taken
B.to take
C.being taken
D.taking

[多选题]队列的基本队形为(　　)；需要时，可以调整为其他队形。
A.横队
B.纵队
C.并列纵队
D.并列横队

[简答题]发动机水温过高的原因哪些？

[单选题]理财师的主要职责是为客户及其家庭提供全方位的专业投资理财建议，直接涉及广大客户的长远经济利益。因此，金融机构和理财师提供理财顾问服务时必须熟悉和遵守相关的法律法规，这说明了理财师具有（ ）的职业特征。
A.顾问性
B.专业性
C.综合性
D.规范性

[多选题]一级动火在首次动火时，各级审批人和动火工作票签发人均应到现场（），确无问题后方可动火。
A.检查防火安全措施是否正确完备
B.监护下做明火试验
C.测定可燃气体燃蒸汽含量是否合格
D.测定易燃液体的可燃蒸汽含量是否合格

[填空题]Cell-Phone Bans While Driving Have More Impact in Dense, Urban Areas
A The study, conducted by Sheldon Jacobson, a professor of computer science and the director of the simulation and optimisation laboratory at Illinois, analysed the relationship between pre-and post-law automobile accident rates using public data from 62 counties in New York. Jacobson and co-researchers Alexander Nikolaev and Matthew Robbins published their results in an article titled Evaluating the Impact of Legislation Prohibiting Hand-Held Cell Phone Use While Driving, which will appear in a forthcoming issue of the Journal Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.
B The team found that after banning hand-held cell phone use while driving, 46 counties in New York experienced lower fatal accident rates, 10 of which did so at a statistically significant level, while all 62 counties experienced lower personal injury accident rates. They also discovered that the personal injury accident rate decrease was more substantive in counties such as Bronx, New York and Queens, where there was a high density of licensed drivers rather than in sparsely populated areas of upstate New York. ’What that suggests is, if you have a congestion of cars and you’re distracted, you’re more likely to hit someone,’ Jacobson said. ’If you have a lower congestion of cars, you’re still distracted, but you’re less likely to hit anyone because there are less people to hit. It’s simple probability.’ Driver distraction is thought to be the cause of nearly 80 per cent of automobile accidents in the U.S., resulting in about 2,600 deaths, 330,000 injuries and 1.5 million instances of property damage annually.
C Although a ban on hand-held cell phone use while driving in rural areas has less of an impact on driver safety, Jacobson says that doesn’t necessarily mean the ban itself is worthless. ’Hand-held cell phone bans are very valuable in high-density urban areas, but less so in lower-density rural areas,’ Jacobson said. ’But that doesn’t mean they have no impact in rural areas. It just means that such legislation is less likely to have an impact on driver accident rates.’
D Jacobson’s study differs from other studies in that, rather than focusing on reaction times of simulated drivers in lab setting, it analysed publicly available data of accident rates published by the New York State Department of Motor Vehicles. To allow for a proper comparison between time periods, the years 1997 to 2001 were treated as the pre-law time period, and the years 2002 to 2007 were considered as the post-law time period. ’Nobody’s done a study like this before,’ he said. ’Everything prior to this is a micro-analysis of reaction time in laboratories by researchers.’ The challenge, Jacobson said, was getting the right data to analyse. ’The best state that had the data to analyse was New York,’ he said. ’They’ve had the hand-held cell phone ban in place since 2001. So we had a lot of data.’
E Jacobson said one of the limitations of the study is extrapolating the data from New York state and projecting it onto the nation at large. ’That’s fraught with problems, but these are limitations we acknowledge,’ he said. ’Every state is unique, but the overall conclusions still stand to reason.’ Jacobson, who also holds appointments as a professor of industrial and enterprise systems engineering, of civil and environmental engineering, says the holy grail of data sets to analyse would be the property damage data collected by insurance companies. Jacobson says the difference between his study and one recently published by the Highway Loss Data Institute, an affiliate of the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, is that he used publicly available data and the number of licensed drivers as a proxy for accident prediction. (The insurance industry-backed report studied pre- and post-ban insurance claims from accidents in California, Connecticut, New York and Washington, D.C. It contends that state laws banning the use of cell phones while driving didn’t reduce the number of vehicle crashes.) If the property damage data were available to Jacobson and his co-researchers, ’We could come up with a more definitive statement,’ he said.
F Another challenge for Jacobson and his team was how to standardise accident data across the counties. Their solution was to use the number of licensed drivers and compare the statistical inferences to licensed-driver density. ’Measuring the throughput of cars is very difficult,’ Jacobson said. ’As a result, using the number of licensed drivers is a reasonable way to standardise, and licensed-driver density provided an interesting measure to compare the counties.’ The measures of traffic safety considered in the study are the number of fatal automobile accidents per 100,000 licensed drivers per year and the number of personal injury accidents per 1,000 licensed drivers per year, Jacobson said. For the purpose of analysis, the personal injury accident rate proved to be a more appropriate measure. ’The trend that we saw was that high-density driving areas tended to have a more precipitous drop in the number of fatalities and accidents after the ban was implemented than in lower- density areas,’ Jacobson said. ’This was more pronounced for personal-injury rates than it was for fatality rates.’
G Despite the exponential growth in cell phone subscribers, Jacobson says that all the evidence suggests that hand-held cell phone bans while driving are worthwhile. ’All the evidence suggests hand-held cell phone bans while driving are a good thing, and this is more evidence to that effect,’ he said. ’But it doesn’t establish it definitively. There’s still more work to be done, but this helps to further clarify the picture.’Choose TWO letters, A-E. Write the correct letters in boxes 34 and 35 on your answer sheet. Which TWO statements are true about the Jacobson’s study according to Reading Passage 3 A It is based on the public data from 62 countries over the world. B It is found that the law is more useful in high density cities than in countryside. C It is implemented by analysing the data in real life rather than doing experiments in the labs. D Its limitation does not hinder the application to the whole country. E The increasing number of mobile users reduces the impact of the law. Do the following statements agree with the information given in Reading Passage 3

[单项选择]
阅读下面的短文，文中有15处空白，每处空白给出了4个选项，请根据短文的内容从 4个选项中选择1个最佳答案。