[填空题]There are many arguments for and against the interview as a selection procedure. The main argument against it is that it results in a wholly (26) decision. As often as not, employers do not choose the best candidate, they choose the candidate who makes a good first impression on them. Some employers, of course, (27) this argument by saying that they have become so (28) in interviewing staff that they are able to make a sound (29) of each candidate’s likely performance.
The main argument in favor of the interview is that an employer is concerned not only with a candidate’s ability, but with the (30) of his or her personality for the particular work situation. Many employers, for example, will overlook occasional (31) from their secretary provided she has a pleasant personality.
It is perhaps true to say, therefore, that the real purpose of an interview is not to assess the assessable (32) of each

[填空题]There are many arguments for and against the interview as a selection procedure. The main argument against it is that it results in a wholly {{U}} (36) {{/U}} decision. As often as not, employers do not choose the best candidate, they choose the candidate who makes a good first impression on them. Some employers, of course, {{U}} (37) {{/U}} to this argument by saying that they have become so {{U}} (38) {{/U}} in interviewing staff that they are able to make a sound {{U}} (39) {{/U}} of each candidate’s likely performance. The main argument in favor of the interview is that an employer is concerned not only with a candidate’s ability, but with the {{U}} (40) {{/U}} of his or her personality for the particular work situation. Many employers, for example, will overlook occasional {{U}} (41) {{/U}} from their secretary provided she has a pleasant personality. It is perhaps true to say, therefore, that the real purpose of an interview is not to assess the assessable {{U}} (42