[单项选择]Politician: Pundits claim that by voting for candidates who promise to cut taxes, people show that they want the government to provide fewer services than it has been providing. By that reasoning, however, people who drink too much alcohol at a party in the evening want a headache the next morning.
Which of the following could replace the statement about people who drink too much without undermining the force of the politician’s argument
A. People who spend more money than they can afford want the things they spend that money on.
B. People who seek different jobs than they currently have do not want to work at all.
C. People who buy new cars want to own cars that are under manufacturer’s warranty.
D. People who decide to stay in bed a few extra minutes on a workday morning want to have to rush to arrive at work on time.
E. (E) People who buy lottery tickets want the economic freedom that winning the lottery would bring.

[单项选择]Which of the following does NOT describe the candidate’s personality（）
A. Enthusiastic
B. Perseverant
C. Eloquent
D. Cooperative

[多项选择]Discussion
Topic: Ways to Save Energy
Now, Candidate A and Candidate B, here is a list of ways to save energy.
(Hand out the list to the candidates and let them read it through. )
What do you think are the most efficient ways to save energy I’d like each of you to choose three from the list and tell each other why. If you hold different opinions you may argue and you may also add your own ideas that are not listed here. You just talk to each other and I won’t join you. You have 5 minutes. All right. Would you begin (The interlocutor may sit back and intervene only when necessary. )
Most Efficient Ways to Save Energy:
●Insulate
●Change bulbs
●Use of heat pump
●Remake factories
●Green driving
●A better fridge
●Flexible payment for new and expensive energy
(For candidates)

[填空题]What does the company promise to do with the candidate’s salary history
They promises to keep it in ______.

[简答题]lodge a claim

[单项选择]

Pundits who want to sound judicious are fond of warning against generalizing. Each country is different, they say, and no one story fits all of Asia. This is, of course, silly, all of these economies plunged into economic crisis within a few months of each other, so they must have had something in common.
In fact, the logic of catastrophe was pretty much the same in Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia and South Korea. (Japan is a very different story. ) In each case investors--mainly, but not entirely, foreign banks who had made short-term loans--all tried to pull their money out at the same time. The result was a combined banking and currency crisis, a banking crisis because no bank can convert all its assets into cash on short notice, a currency crisis because panicked investors were trying not only to convert long-term assets into cash, but to convert baht or rupiah into dollars. In the face of the stampede, governments had no good options. If they let their currencies plung
A. were far from a panacea in all cases
B. were feasible in their recipient countries
C. failed to work in their recipient countries
D. were rejected unanimously by Asian countries