更多"Let us assume, for the moment, that"的相关试题:
[单项选择]Let us assume, for the moment, that labor m not prepared to work for a lower money-wage and that a reduction in the existing level of money-wages would lead, through strikes or otherwise, to a withdrawal from the labor market of labor which is now employed. Does it follow from this that the existing level of real wages accurately measures the marginal disutility of labor Not necessarily. For, although a reduction in the existing money-wage would lead to a withdrawal of labor, it does not follow that a fall in the value of the existing money-wage in terms of wage-goods would do so, if it were due to a rise in the price of the latter. In other words, it may be the case that within a certain range the demand of labor is for a minimum money-wage and not for a minimum real wage. The classical school has tacitly assumed that this would involve no significant change in their theory. But this is not so. For if the supply of labor is not a function of real wages as its sole variable, their argu
A. a fall in the value of the existing money-wage would lead to a withdrawal of labor
B. a rise in the price of wage-goods would lead to a withdrawal of labor
C. the demand of labor is for a rise of existing money-wage
D. the demand of labor is for reduction in the value of real wages
[单项选择]Let us assume, for the moment, that labor is not prepared to work for a lower money-wage and that a reduction in the existing level of money-wages would lead, through strikes or otherwise, to a withdrawal from the labor market of labor which is now employed. Does it follow from this that the existing level of real wages accurately measures the marginal disutility of labor Not necessarily. For, although a reduction in the existing money-wage would lead to a withdrawal of labor, it does not follow that a fall in the value of the existing money-wage in terms of wage-goods would do so, if it were due to a rise in the price of the latter. In other words, it may be the case that within a certain range the demand of labor is for a minimum money-wage and not for a minimum real wage. The classical school has tacitly assumed that this would involve no significant change in their theory. But this is not so. For if the supply of labor is not a function of real wages as its sole variable, their arg
A. a fall in the value of the existing money-wage would lead to a withdrawal of labor
B. a rise in the price of wage-goods would lead to a withdrawal of labor
C. the demand of labor is for a rise of existing money-wage
D. the demand of labor is for reduction in the value of real wages
[单项选择]
Passage 1
Let us assume, for the moment, that
labor m not prepared to work for a lower money-wage and that a reduction in the
existing level of money-wages would lead, through strikes or otherwise, to a
withdrawal from the labor market of labor which is now employed. Does it follow
from this that the existing level of real wages accurately measures the marginal
disutility of labor Not necessarily. For, although a reduction in the existing
money-wage would lead to a withdrawal of labor, it does not follow that a fall
in the value of the existing money-wage in terms of wage-goods would do so, if
it were due to a rise in the price of the latter. In other words, it may be the
case that within a certain range the demand of labor is for a minimum money-wage
and not for a minimum real wage. The classical school has tacitly assumed that
this would A. Labor would stipulate for money-wages. B. Labor would violently resist a reduction of real wages. C. Labor would strenuously resist a reduction of both money-wages and real wages. D. Labor would stipulate for real wages.
购买搜题卡查看答案
[会员特权] 开通VIP, 查看 全部题目答案
[会员特权] 享免全部广告特权
请选择支付方式
-
微信支付
-
支付宝支付
立即支付
系统将自动为您注册账号
请使用微信扫码支付
截图扫码使用小程序[完全免费查看答案]
请不要关闭本页面,支付完成后请点击【支付完成】按钮
恭喜您,购买搜题卡成功
重要提示:请拍照或截图保存账号密码!
我要搜题网官网:https://www.woyaosouti.com
我已记住账号密码
|