The table before which we sit may be,
as the scientist maintains, composed of dancing atoms, but it does not reveal
itself to us as anything of the kind, and it is not with dancing atoms but a
solid and motionless object that we live. So remote is this "real" table—and most of the other "realities" with which science deals—that it cannot be discussed in terms which have any human value, and though it may receive out purely intellectual credence it cannot be woven into the pattern of life as it is led, in contradistinction to life as we attempt to think about it. Vibrations in the either are so totally unlike, let us say, the color purple that the gulf between them cannot be bridged, and they are, to all intents and purposes, not one but two separate things of which the second and less "real" must be the most significant for A. a solid motionless object B. certain characteristic vibrations in "ether" C. a form fixed in space and time D. a mass of atoms on motion [单项选择]For about three centuries we have been doing science, trying science out, using science for the construction of what we call modern civilization. Every dispensable item of contemporary technology, from canal locks to dial telephones to penicillin, was pieced together from the analysis of data provided by one or another series of scientific experiments. Three hundred years seems a long time for testing a new approach to human inter-living, long enough to settle back for critical appraisal of the scientific method, maybe even long enough to vote on whether to go on with it or not. There is an argument.
Voices have been raised in protest since the beginning, rising in pitch and violence in the nineteenth century during the early stages of the industrial revolution, summoning urgent crowds into the streets any day these days on the issue of nuclear energy. "Give it back," say some of the voices, "It doesn’t really work, we’ve tried it and it doesn’t work. Go back three hundred years a A. For three hundred years there have been people holding a hostile attitude toward science. B. Scientific experiments in the past three hundred years have produced many valuable items. C. Some people think three hundred years is not long enough to set back for critical appraisal of scientific method. D. Modern civilization depends on science so man supports scientific progress unanimously. 我来回答: 提交
|