| We assumed ethics needed the seal of
certainty, else it was non-rational. And certainty was to be produced by a
deductive model: the correct actions were derivable from classical first
principles or a hierarchically ranked pantheon of principles. This model,
though, is bankrupt. I suggest we think of ethics as analogous to language usage. There are no univocal rules of grammar and style which uniquely determine the best sentence for a particular situation. Nor is language usage universalizable. Although a sentence or phrase is warranted in one case, it does not mean it is automatically appropriate in like circumstances. Nonetheless, language usage is not subjective. This should not surprise us in the least. All intellectual pursuits are relativistic in just these senses. Political science, psychology, chemistry, and physic A. explicitly clear B. implicitly vague C. certain but non-rational D. relative but not subjective [单项选择]So much have we achieved, so much more （ ）.
A. is there to achieve B. there is to achieve C. be there to achieve D. there should be to achieve [填空题]Freud learned from Charcot everything he needed to know about how to cure mentally iii patients.
[单项选择]
Student Volunteers Needed!
On Saturday, December 12th, from 10 A.M. until 4 P.M., Carverton Middle School will be holding a music festival in the school gymnasium. The special event will feature a variety of professional musicians and singers.
|
