[单项选择] The tariff-jumping motive for FDI is well developed in the literature. The trade-of foreign firms typically face in these models is based on the level of the tariff when exporting versus the boardcost associated with setting up a manufacturing plant abroad. Other studies compare the effects of tariffs with the effects of quota and voluntary export restraints (VERs) and have shown how the profit gain for foreign firms due to VERs lowers the propensity to engage in FDI. While the use of tariffs, quota and VERs has been reduced as a result of multilateral trade negotiations, the use of other trade policy instruments, notably antidumping, has increased. Recent empirical work has confirmed that the FDI response to antidumping actions is certainly not uncommon, in particular in case of antidumping actions targeting Japanese firms, in a recent study, analyses duty-jumping FDI by firms based in other countries than Japan. The antidumping jumping FDI is very limited in scale in case fi
A. The evidence suggests that EU firms show a comparable FDI response if they are targeted by US antidumping actions.
B. The evidence shows the possibility of a ’protection building equilibrium’.
C. A foreign firm that intends to engage in second period FDI increases its first period export in order to increase the level of protection faced by the rival foreign firm.
D. The evidence implies that they are concerned with the effects of economic integration involving the abolition of antidumping law.

更多"The tariff-jumping motive for FDI i"的相关试题:

[单项选择] The tariff-jumping motive for FDI is well developed in the literature. The trade-of foreign firms typically face in these models is based on the level of the tariff when exporting versus the boardcost associated with setting up a manufacturing plant abroad. Other studies compare the effects of tariffs with the effects of quota and voluntary export restraints (VERs) and have shown how the profit gain for foreign firms due to VERs lowers the propensity to engage in FDI. While the use of tariffs, quota and VERs has been reduced as a result of multilateral trade negotiations, the use of other trade policy instruments, notably antidumping, has increased. Recent empirical work has confirmed that the FDI response to antidumping actions is certainly not uncommon, in particular in case of antidumping actions targeting Japanese firms, in a recent study, analyses duty-jumping FDI by firms based in other countries than Japan. The antidumping jumping FDI is very limited in scale in case fi
A. It implies that it is often a feature of exporters based in developing countries.
B. It implies that foreign firms relinquish their cost advantage and produce at the same marginal cost as those of EU producers.
C. It implies the differences in FDI responses between firms from developed and developing countries.
D. It implies that in EU antidumping practice, a substantial number of cases are settled through price-undertakings.

查看答案

我来回答:

提交