A hundred years ago it was assumed and scientifically "proved" by economists that the laws of society made it necessary to have a vast army of poor and jobless people in order to keep the economy going. Today, hardly anybody would dare to voice this principle. It is generally accepted that nobody should be excluded from the wealth of the nation, either by the laws of nature or by those of society.46)The opinions, which were current a hundred years ago, that the poor owed their conditions to their ignorance, lack of responsibility, are outdated. In all Western industrialized countries, a system of insurance has been introduced which guarantees everyone a minimum of subsistence(生活维持费)in case of unemployment, sickness and old age. I would go one step further and argue that, even if these conditions are not present, everyone has the right to receive the means to subsist (维持生活), in other words, he can claim this subsistence minimum without having to have any "rea
A hundred years ago it was assumed and scientifically "proved" by economists that the laws of society made it necessary to have a vast army of poor and jobless people in order to keep the economy going. Today, hardly anybody would dare to voice this principle. It is generally accepted that nobody should be excluded from the wealth of the nation, either by the laws of nature or by those of society.46)The opinions, which were current a hundred years ago, that the poor owed their conditions to their ignorance, lack of responsibility, are outdated. In all Western industrialized countries, a system of insurance has been introduced which guarantees everyone a minimum of subsistence(生活维持费)in case of unemployment, sickness and old age. I would go one step further and argue that, even if these conditions are not present, everyone has the right to receive the means to subsist (维持生活), in other words, he can claim this subsistence minimum without having to have any "rea
A hundred years ago it was assumed and
scientifically "proved" by economists that the laws of society make it necessary
to have a vast army of poor and jobless people in order to keep the economy
going. today, hardly anybody would dare to voice the principle. It is generally
accepted that nobody should be excluded from the wealth of the nation, either by
the law of nature or by those of society. The opinions are outdated, which were
current a hundred years ago, that the poor owed their conditions to their
ignorance, lack of responsibility. In all western industrialized countries, a
system of insurance has been introduced which guarantees everyone a minimum of
subsistence in case of unemployment, sickness and old age. I would go one step
further and argue that, even if these conditions are not present, in other
words, one can claim this substance minimum with A. provide benefits for the old, sick and unemployed B. encourage people to take on more social obligations C. guarantee everybody the right to be employed D. provide everyone/he right to a minimum subsistence for a certain period 我来回答: 提交
|