Over the past decade, thousands of patents have seen granted for what are called business methods. Amazon. corn received one for its "one-click" online payment system. Merrill Lynch got legal protection for an asset allocation strategy. One inventor patented a technique for lifting a box.
Now the nation’s top patent court appears completely ready to scale back on business-method patents, which have been controversial ever since they were first authorized 10 years ago. In a move that has intellectual-property lawyers abuzz, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit said it would use particular case to conduct a broad review of business-method patents. In re Bilski, as the case is known, is "a very big deal", says Dernnis D. Crouch of the University of Missouri School of Law. It "has the potential to eliminate an entire class of patents".
Curbs on business-method claims would be a dramatic about-face, because it was the
A. their limited value to business
B. their connection with asset allocation
C. the possible restriction on their granting
D. the controversy over authorization
Over the past decade, thousands of patents have seen granted for what are called business methods. Amazon. corn received one for its "one-click" online payment system. Merrill Lynch got legal protection for an asset allocation strategy. One inventor patented a technique for lifting a box.
Now the nation’s top patent court appears completely ready to scale back on business-method patents, which have been controversial ever since they were first authorized 10 years ago. In a move that has intellectual-property lawyers abuzz, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit said it would use particular case to conduct a broad review of business-method patents. In re Bilski, as the case is known, is "a very big deal", says Dernnis D. Crouch of the University of Missouri School of Law. It "has the potential to eliminate an entire class of patents".
Curbs on business-method claims would be a dramatic about-face, because it was the
A. Its ruling complies with the court decisions.
B. It involves a very big business transaction.
C. It has been dismissed by the Federal Circuit.
D. It may change the legal practices in the U.S.
Over the past decade, many
companies had perfected the art of creating automatic behaviors-habits-among
consumers. These habits have helped companies earn billions of dollars when
customers eat snacks or wipe counters almost without thinking, often in response
to a carefully designed set of daily cues. "There are fundamental public health problems, like dirty hands instead of a soap habit, that remain killers only because we can’t figure out how to change people’s habit," said Dr. Curtis, the director the Hygiene Center at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine. " We wanted to learn from private industry how to create new behaviors that happen automatically. " The companies that Dr. Curtis turned to-Procter & Gamble, Colgate-Palmolive and Unilever-had invested hundreds of millions of dollars finding the subt A. Tide B. Crest C. Colgate D. Unilever 我来回答: 提交
|