[填空题]Do animals have rights This is how the question is usually put. It sounds like a useful, ground- clearing way to start. 71. Actually, it isn’’t, because it assumes that there is an agreed account of human fights, which is something the world does not have. 　　On one view of rights, to be sure, it necessarily follows that animals have none. 72. Some philosophers argue that rights exist only within a social contract, as part of an exchange of duties and entitlements. Therefore, animals cannot have rights. The idea of punishing a tiger that kills somebody is absurd ,for exactly the same reason, so is the idea that tigers have rights. However, this is only one account ,and by no means an uncontested one. It denies rights not only to animals but also to some people―for instance, to infants, the mentally incapable and future generations. In addition, it is unclear what force a contract can have for people who never consented to it: how do you reply to somebody who says "I don’’t like this co

最新试题

• ●    多接口关联可以生成信令流程图，并可进行双击消息跳转，查看具体的消息解码。
• ●    广义的社会服务中不包括（）。
• ●    [单选题]架落车时，禁止手扶心盘销。必要时必须在两侧旁承上各垫以( )mm以上厚的硬木防护垫方准进
• ●    [判断题]( )零部件性能下降、状态劣化，判定即将或基本达到寿命时，应进行更换。
• ●    [单选题] 下面哪个不是失实?警报道的产生原因？（ ）
• ●    瘀血所致之眩晕的兼症有